Scene: Saturday Night. Lecturer Women's Shoes residence. An cartoon conversation.
ProfessorKuzer: Do you know what you are saying? Do you comprehend the consequences of posting this concept on your career?
ProfessorGillford: I know and I do. And I will.
ProfessorKuzer: Gillford don't do it, it will be the end of you. Your concept is more questionable than baptising a goof.
ProfessorGillford: It is the fact. And I am willing to share my popularity on it.
ProfessorKuzer: The feminists and liberals will generate a share through you and your popularity if you put this out. Can't you analysis and analyze a different subject? one with realistic non-academic uses?
ProfessorGillford: Non-academic! How challenge you sir! How challenge you!
ProfessorKuzer: I mean there are a lot of other excellent topics...
ProfessorGillford: This is a topic of wide significance. It impacts the areas of Business economics, Mindset and Philosophy; moreover to our own area of Anthropology.
ProfessorKuzer: Anthropology does not issue itself with women shoes!
ProfessorGillford: Does it not? Tell me, have you ever met a guy who has not considered why women invest so a lot of your efforts and energy and attempt, attempt and cash purchasing or considering shoes? Or one who has not been decreased to a tumor causing condition of thoughts, because of the dilemma around women shoes?
ProfessorKuzer: Well yes, every man sensed that at some factor of your efforts and energy and attempt. But that is a aspect of existence; it cannot be assisted.
ProfessorGillford: No, not any more. I have invested 6 decades exploring it; and the globe will lastly know the fact about the relationship between women and footwear.
ProfessorKuzer: That women use footwear to be celibate and that the only requirements they have while purchasing footwear is how costly they are!!!
ProfessorGillford: That's right. Women buy footwear to be celibate. And the option is not dependant on color or kind or relaxation, all those techniques are just used to rationalize the costly cost tag. Footwear is the cost that women cost to be celibate.
ProfessorKuzer: Then why don't they just stroll into the shop and buy the most costly pair? Why invest time on end trying various couples of footwear and getting opinions?
ProfessorGillford: Ah yes, that is because of three factors. First of all while purchasing footwear women need to determine what is the most that they can invest on a couple while still having cash remaining for meals, secondly how to rationalize the cost to others and themselves and additionally how to discover enough faults in the not affordable footwear as to not experience bad for not purchasing them.
ProfessorKuzer: Seriously? You mean to say that women footwear have nothing to do with strolling and feet protection?
ProfessorGillford: Have you ever come across a women shoes marketing explaining how relaxed a shoes is? They don't even describe how excellent a woman will look in the footwear, it is all just about how excellent looking the footwear are! And seriously have you ever tried to get a woman basically strolling, they take off their footwear in 20 actions and grumble about them!
ProfessorKuzer: Maybe they think that footwear are a significant aspect of overall overall look, you know the collection - caps, clothing, components and the like...
ProfessorGillford: Who but a gay man would look at a ladies shoes? And that cannot rationalize how long that women invest purchasing shoes? I mean no guy looks at a ladies footwear and goes man I got to get me some of that! All the excellent areas are way above the footwear, there is no need to look previous the dress. And despite being wiser than men; women keep invest a while attempt and cash to buy footwear. That shows that their factors for doing so cannot be logical.
ProfessorKuzer: OK but the weblink to celibacy is still uncertain to me. How do footwear keep women celibate?
ProfessorGillford: The outcomes of my analysis are that the more time a women legs contact the floor the more promiscuous she becomes, look at parrots and seafood both companion for lifestyle - low leg contact. Now consider reduced animals and bugs they just can't get enough - large leg contact. The vital factor that women take off during sex, anywhere, are their footwear, have you ever considered about that? Why even when a woman is intoxicated she will require on getting off her footwear before any hanky panky.
ProfessorKuzer: Couldn't that be because they good care more for what happens to their footwear, than what happens to their systems, which is why they take them off during sex?
ProfessorGillford: If women liked footwear so much then they would cure shoes creators and shoes organization entrepreneurs as celebrities, or shoes creators would have groupies like doctors. Tell me have you ever seen a woman lust after a shoes maker? It is all for being celibate. Do you know that as an exciting corollary during all my moves I discovered that communities where there are no ladies footwear are locally the most joyful on the globe.
ProfessorKuzer: I think you have invested too a lot of your efforts and energy and attempt under the sun, during your analysis on those exotic isles. And the outcomes are displaying.
ProfessorGillford: OK allows look at the essential points. Wealthy women shop for footwear the more than anyone else and yet have you ever seen an excellent woman stroll or say that she has enough shoes? Is that not paradoxical? In inclusion even when they do go out the footwear are always under the desk, where no one can see them. Footwear is the cost that men pay to keep women celibate.
ProfessorKuzer: Now you just bullshitting me.
ProfessorGillford: Let me provide you with a individual example. Have you observed that in every one your lesbian dreams women never use shoes? That's because unconsciously men know that a woman with footwear would never get trendy. Want more? OK have you observed of a dream of women creating out in a shoes shop or viewed a adult where women are getting it on in a shoes shop? Considering how much they like footwear, there should be a ton of both but no it isn't so. Why?
ProfessorKuzer: I am a professor of Anthropology and gladly wedded. I do not observe porn! And your so known as analysis is all qualitative and does not have numbers.
ProfessorGillford: You might be a older professor but you are still a guy. And as for numbers have you seen the inhabitants numbers of simple feet thirdworld countries? What could be more proof? I tell you the evidence is all around us. Haven't you observed of the old woman who resided in a shoe?
ProfessorKuzer: That was a dream you cannot evaluate that. And plus she had a whole lot of children.
ProfessorGillford: Accurately had a whole lot of children and then desired to be celibate so shifted into a shoes. It is realistic.
ProfessorKuzer: Rubbish. In all your decades, publish a crack up has a woman ever remaining behind a footwear in your apartment? Outfits maybe, cosmetics maybe, components maybe but footwear never. That shows that they basically like footwear more than everything else.
ProfessorGillford: That is not it. A ladies legs and not her mind are the most highly effective sex-related body. It is so apparent, a woman can modify her thoughts whenever they want but she can never modify her legs. That's why the Japanese people used to feet combine and cut of the women feet and reduce you to management their women.
ProfessorKuzer: That was a insane fad, not something depending on reason!
ProfessorGillford: No they realized exactly what they were doing. The feet is the most highly effective sex-related body. But women with the help of French style brands have tried to cover up this fact. Why even these days the few men who know the fact about legs are not heard, but considered to be feet fetish perverted people by community.
ProfessorKuzer: Which is what I am progressively beginning to suppose that you might be. What you are saying cannot be actual. If celibacy was the objective, then why would women ask men how their footwear looked?
ProfessorGillford: Ah, that is a technique query. Because they know that only gay men look at and have views on women footwear. And yet they ask because a woman is trying to say that, I am being celibate for you by dressed in these footwear so you sure as terrible know about it. And if a guy solutions that they look bad, then she will experience bad because she is being celibate for such a bad reason; and if he says they look excellent then she knows that he is gay or is onto the fact about footwear.
ProfessorKuzer: I am just not assured by this.
ProfessorGillford: Start your sight and your thoughts Lecturer Kuzer. Let me describe one more secret to you, why do you think that women endanger to hit men on their go with their shoes? As a man do you think that it would hurt? No sir, the Women's Shoes significance of that is that the woman is harmful her man that she will take off her footwear and consequently not be celibate any more.
ProfessorKuzer: Shoes and celibacy, who would have thought?
ProfessorGillford: Exactly and here the fact has become so corroded that men are purchasing and going purchasing for costly footwear with women in the wish of getting some, when that is the very factor that is preventing them. Can you imagine? True activity is in getting the footwear off and not her outfit, because you can be sure to get some with no footwear, however no outfit is not certified.
ProfessorKuzer: But why do women want to be so celibate and not have sex?
ProfessorGillford: Wo Wo keep on a second there! I said I was intelligent enough to determine the fact about women footwear, I am not intelligent enough to determine women! Please!
ProfessorKuzer: Could it not be possible that you have just installed different pieces of information to kind this concept about women and shoes?
ProfessorGillford: Do you have a better explanation?
ProfessorKuzer: Do you know what you are saying? Do you comprehend the consequences of posting this concept on your career?
ProfessorGillford: I know and I do. And I will.
ProfessorKuzer: Gillford don't do it, it will be the end of you. Your concept is more questionable than baptising a goof.
ProfessorGillford: It is the fact. And I am willing to share my popularity on it.
ProfessorKuzer: The feminists and liberals will generate a share through you and your popularity if you put this out. Can't you analysis and analyze a different subject? one with realistic non-academic uses?
ProfessorGillford: Non-academic! How challenge you sir! How challenge you!
ProfessorKuzer: I mean there are a lot of other excellent topics...
ProfessorGillford: This is a topic of wide significance. It impacts the areas of Business economics, Mindset and Philosophy; moreover to our own area of Anthropology.
ProfessorKuzer: Anthropology does not issue itself with women shoes!
ProfessorGillford: Does it not? Tell me, have you ever met a guy who has not considered why women invest so a lot of your efforts and energy and attempt, attempt and cash purchasing or considering shoes? Or one who has not been decreased to a tumor causing condition of thoughts, because of the dilemma around women shoes?
ProfessorKuzer: Well yes, every man sensed that at some factor of your efforts and energy and attempt. But that is a aspect of existence; it cannot be assisted.
ProfessorGillford: No, not any more. I have invested 6 decades exploring it; and the globe will lastly know the fact about the relationship between women and footwear.
ProfessorKuzer: That women use footwear to be celibate and that the only requirements they have while purchasing footwear is how costly they are!!!
ProfessorGillford: That's right. Women buy footwear to be celibate. And the option is not dependant on color or kind or relaxation, all those techniques are just used to rationalize the costly cost tag. Footwear is the cost that women cost to be celibate.
ProfessorKuzer: Then why don't they just stroll into the shop and buy the most costly pair? Why invest time on end trying various couples of footwear and getting opinions?
ProfessorGillford: Ah yes, that is because of three factors. First of all while purchasing footwear women need to determine what is the most that they can invest on a couple while still having cash remaining for meals, secondly how to rationalize the cost to others and themselves and additionally how to discover enough faults in the not affordable footwear as to not experience bad for not purchasing them.
ProfessorKuzer: Seriously? You mean to say that women footwear have nothing to do with strolling and feet protection?
ProfessorGillford: Have you ever come across a women shoes marketing explaining how relaxed a shoes is? They don't even describe how excellent a woman will look in the footwear, it is all just about how excellent looking the footwear are! And seriously have you ever tried to get a woman basically strolling, they take off their footwear in 20 actions and grumble about them!
ProfessorKuzer: Maybe they think that footwear are a significant aspect of overall overall look, you know the collection - caps, clothing, components and the like...
ProfessorGillford: Who but a gay man would look at a ladies shoes? And that cannot rationalize how long that women invest purchasing shoes? I mean no guy looks at a ladies footwear and goes man I got to get me some of that! All the excellent areas are way above the footwear, there is no need to look previous the dress. And despite being wiser than men; women keep invest a while attempt and cash to buy footwear. That shows that their factors for doing so cannot be logical.
ProfessorKuzer: OK but the weblink to celibacy is still uncertain to me. How do footwear keep women celibate?
ProfessorGillford: The outcomes of my analysis are that the more time a women legs contact the floor the more promiscuous she becomes, look at parrots and seafood both companion for lifestyle - low leg contact. Now consider reduced animals and bugs they just can't get enough - large leg contact. The vital factor that women take off during sex, anywhere, are their footwear, have you ever considered about that? Why even when a woman is intoxicated she will require on getting off her footwear before any hanky panky.
ProfessorKuzer: Couldn't that be because they good care more for what happens to their footwear, than what happens to their systems, which is why they take them off during sex?
ProfessorGillford: If women liked footwear so much then they would cure shoes creators and shoes organization entrepreneurs as celebrities, or shoes creators would have groupies like doctors. Tell me have you ever seen a woman lust after a shoes maker? It is all for being celibate. Do you know that as an exciting corollary during all my moves I discovered that communities where there are no ladies footwear are locally the most joyful on the globe.
ProfessorKuzer: I think you have invested too a lot of your efforts and energy and attempt under the sun, during your analysis on those exotic isles. And the outcomes are displaying.
ProfessorGillford: OK allows look at the essential points. Wealthy women shop for footwear the more than anyone else and yet have you ever seen an excellent woman stroll or say that she has enough shoes? Is that not paradoxical? In inclusion even when they do go out the footwear are always under the desk, where no one can see them. Footwear is the cost that men pay to keep women celibate.
ProfessorKuzer: Now you just bullshitting me.
ProfessorGillford: Let me provide you with a individual example. Have you observed that in every one your lesbian dreams women never use shoes? That's because unconsciously men know that a woman with footwear would never get trendy. Want more? OK have you observed of a dream of women creating out in a shoes shop or viewed a adult where women are getting it on in a shoes shop? Considering how much they like footwear, there should be a ton of both but no it isn't so. Why?
ProfessorKuzer: I am a professor of Anthropology and gladly wedded. I do not observe porn! And your so known as analysis is all qualitative and does not have numbers.
ProfessorGillford: You might be a older professor but you are still a guy. And as for numbers have you seen the inhabitants numbers of simple feet thirdworld countries? What could be more proof? I tell you the evidence is all around us. Haven't you observed of the old woman who resided in a shoe?
ProfessorKuzer: That was a dream you cannot evaluate that. And plus she had a whole lot of children.
ProfessorGillford: Accurately had a whole lot of children and then desired to be celibate so shifted into a shoes. It is realistic.
ProfessorKuzer: Rubbish. In all your decades, publish a crack up has a woman ever remaining behind a footwear in your apartment? Outfits maybe, cosmetics maybe, components maybe but footwear never. That shows that they basically like footwear more than everything else.
ProfessorGillford: That is not it. A ladies legs and not her mind are the most highly effective sex-related body. It is so apparent, a woman can modify her thoughts whenever they want but she can never modify her legs. That's why the Japanese people used to feet combine and cut of the women feet and reduce you to management their women.
ProfessorKuzer: That was a insane fad, not something depending on reason!
ProfessorGillford: No they realized exactly what they were doing. The feet is the most highly effective sex-related body. But women with the help of French style brands have tried to cover up this fact. Why even these days the few men who know the fact about legs are not heard, but considered to be feet fetish perverted people by community.
ProfessorKuzer: Which is what I am progressively beginning to suppose that you might be. What you are saying cannot be actual. If celibacy was the objective, then why would women ask men how their footwear looked?
ProfessorGillford: Ah, that is a technique query. Because they know that only gay men look at and have views on women footwear. And yet they ask because a woman is trying to say that, I am being celibate for you by dressed in these footwear so you sure as terrible know about it. And if a guy solutions that they look bad, then she will experience bad because she is being celibate for such a bad reason; and if he says they look excellent then she knows that he is gay or is onto the fact about footwear.
ProfessorKuzer: I am just not assured by this.
ProfessorGillford: Start your sight and your thoughts Lecturer Kuzer. Let me describe one more secret to you, why do you think that women endanger to hit men on their go with their shoes? As a man do you think that it would hurt? No sir, the Women's Shoes significance of that is that the woman is harmful her man that she will take off her footwear and consequently not be celibate any more.
ProfessorKuzer: Shoes and celibacy, who would have thought?
ProfessorGillford: Exactly and here the fact has become so corroded that men are purchasing and going purchasing for costly footwear with women in the wish of getting some, when that is the very factor that is preventing them. Can you imagine? True activity is in getting the footwear off and not her outfit, because you can be sure to get some with no footwear, however no outfit is not certified.
ProfessorKuzer: But why do women want to be so celibate and not have sex?
ProfessorGillford: Wo Wo keep on a second there! I said I was intelligent enough to determine the fact about women footwear, I am not intelligent enough to determine women! Please!
ProfessorKuzer: Could it not be possible that you have just installed different pieces of information to kind this concept about women and shoes?
ProfessorGillford: Do you have a better explanation?
